Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
80
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 12% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 91 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 80 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 91 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024(20 mappings)

27011-1Scope
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
27011-3Terms and definitions
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
27011-5.2Information Security Roles in Telecoms
→CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
27011-5.3Segregation of duties
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain2 targets
→CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
27011-6.3Awareness and Training5 targets
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices2 targets
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
27011-8.2Network security and segregation2 targets
→CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
27011-8.3Cryptography and key management2 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management2 targets
→CPG-5.AVulnerability Disclosure Program
→CPG-7.BIncident Response Plans
27011-8.6Data protection and backup
→CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 1,016 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls your existing ISO/IEC 27011:2024 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 into CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 into ISO/IEC 27011:2024
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 12% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,016 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 91 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024, where 30 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 91 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 11 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, representing 12% coverage. The remaining 80 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

80 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024 with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – ISO/IEC 27011:2024 (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.