Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 27% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 414K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 414K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(6 mappings)

27011-1Scope2 targets
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
27011-3Terms and definitions2 targets
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
27400-3Terms and definitions2 targets
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)

27011-5.3Segregation of duties
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain
FedRAMP-SupplyChain-SBOMFedRAMP supply chain risk management + SBOM (per EO 14028 + NIST 800-218 SSDF)

Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)

27011-7.1Physical security perimeters
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
27011-7.3Equipment protection
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation

Technological(1 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(6 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
27011-8.3Cryptography and key management
FedRAMP-BaselinesFedRAMP Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters
27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
27011-8.6Data protection and backup2 targets
FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
FedRAMP-IncidentReportingFedRAMP incident reporting to PMO and US-CERT

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (414K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 13 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to FedRAMP Rev 5?

37 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.