Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
64%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 64% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(3 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training2 targets
CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
CPG-4.CCybersecurity Awareness Training

Access Control and Identity Management(6 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management2 targets
CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms3 targets
CPG-1.ADefault Password Change
CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
CPG-4.CCybersecurity Awareness Training
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Network and Communications Security(9 mappings)

AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation2 targets
CPG-1.DMulti-Factor Authentication for Remote Access
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security3 targets
CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection4 targets
CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
CPG-3.CSecure Sensitive Data Collection
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

System Security and Operations(2 mappings)

AWWA-4.1Malware Protection
CPG-7.BIncident Reporting to CISA
AWWA-4.2Patch Management
CPG-5.AKnown Exploited Vulnerability Remediation

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 25 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Recovery, where 4 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 25 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 16 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

9 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Recovery with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Recovery (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.