TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 30% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(4 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training3 targets
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training

Access Control and Identity Management(7 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management2 targets
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms4 targets
→CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Network and Communications Security(9 mappings)

AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation2 targets
→CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security3 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection4 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SLSA11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SIG (Shared Assessments)11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PTES11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OWASP SAMM11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OWASP MASVS11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OpenSSF Scorecard11 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Monitoring, where 2 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 11 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

26 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Monitoring with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Monitoring (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.