Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

41
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 30% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 702 frameworks | 342K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 342K+ mappings across 702 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(3 mappings)

27011-1Scope
NIST800-CP-8Telecommunications services
27011-2Normative references
NIST800-CP-8Telecommunications services
27011-3Terms and definitions
NIST800-CP-8Telecommunications services

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(6 mappings)

27011-5.3Segregation of duties3 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain3 targets
NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements

Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications(7 mappings)

27011-7.1Physical security perimeters3 targets
NIST800-PE-14Environmental controls
NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations
NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
27011-7.3Equipment protection3 targets
NIST800-PE-14Environmental controls
NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations
NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
27011-7.4Physical Security of Network Sites
NIST800-CP-8Telecommunications services

Physical(1 mappings)

27011-7.4Physical Security of Network Sites
NIST800-CP-8Telecommunications services

Technological(3 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices3 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
NIST800-AC-6Least privilege

+21 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 702 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 702 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 702 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (342K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 15 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

35 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.