TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

52
Controls Mapped
51
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 17% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 103 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 85 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 103 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 52 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

GV - Govern(12 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk3 targets
→NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
→NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
→NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established3 targets
→NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
→NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
→NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments3 targets
→NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment
→NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
→NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established3 targets
→NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
→NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
→NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements

ID - Identify(8 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained3 targets
→NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
→NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
→NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained3 targets
→NIST800-IR-2Incident response training
→NIST800-IR-5Incident monitoring
→NIST800-IR-7Incident response assistance
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified2 targets
→NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment
→NIST800-RA-2Security categorization

+32 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202220 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation19 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 536 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 103 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 172 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 103 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 18 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 85 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

85 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.