TheArtOfService vs Delve
Delve is AI-native compliance automation for SOC 2, HIPAA and ISO, with more than 500 customers and a $32M Series A behind it. It gets a company from nothing to audit-ready on a chosen standard. TheArtOfService answers the question either side of that: given what you already hold, how much of the next standard is already satisfied. Judged control by control across 686 frameworks and 310K+ cross-framework mappings, with the reasoning behind every claim and the rejected claims kept where you can read them.
| Feature | TheArtOfService | Delve |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Tells you what your existing evidence already covers | Gets you audit-ready on a chosen standard |
| Framework coverage | 686 frameworks | SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO and a focused set |
| Cross-framework mapping | 310K+ judged mappings, each with reasoning | Common controls within supported standards |
| Rejected claims published | Every refuted mapping kept and queryable | Not published |
| Agent access | MCP endpoint, free tools need no key | No public MCP server |
| Evidence collection and monitoring | Not offered | Core strength |
| Pricing | $299 per crosswalk, or from $19/month | Quote on request |
| Own certification | None, and our own gap report is published | SOC 2 |
Why Choose TheArtOfService
Unmatched Coverage
686 compliance frameworks with 21,696 controls and 310K+ cross-framework mappings — far beyond any competitor.
Accessible Pricing
Professional plan at $149/month with no annual contracts. A generous free tier gives full platform access. No sales calls required.
Maximum Flexibility
No integrations needed to get started. Instant access to framework mapping, AI advisory, and self-assessments. Cancel anytime.
686
Frameworks
21,696
Controls
310K+
Cross-Mappings
824
Assessments
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this a replacement for Delve?
No. Delve automates evidence collection and walks a company to an audit on a chosen standard. We collect no evidence and offer no auditors. If the job is getting SOC 2 done, they do that and we do not.
Then when would I use this instead?
When the question is which standard to take next, or how much of it you already satisfy. Holding SOC 2 and looking at ISO 27001 is a crosswalk question, and it decides a budget before anyone starts collecting evidence. Readiness tools are built around the handful of standards they support; this is a 686-framework question.
Can I use both?
That is the expected case. Decide the scope here, then collect against it with whatever you already own. Nothing here asks you to move off anything.
Try Free — No Credit Card Required
Create a free account and explore 686 frameworks, run self-assessments, and get AI compliance advisory. Upgrade to Professional for $149/month when you are ready.
Get Started Free →Free forever — no credit card required