Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsISO 27701

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to ISO 27701. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
78
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to ISO 27701 with 12% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 84 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(11 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27701-15Access control for personal data
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness2 targets
ISO27701-16Data breach notification requirements
ISO27701-17Security incident response procedures
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation2 targets
ISO27701-16Data breach notification requirements
ISO27701-17Security incident response procedures
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement2 targets
ISO27701-16Data breach notification requirements
ISO27701-17Security incident response procedures
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
ISO27701-15Access control for personal data
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards3 targets
ISO27701-04Purpose limitation and specification
ISO27701-05Data minimization requirements
ISO27701-22Cl. 6 Privacy-specific guidance — privacy by design and default as part of PIMS-specific requirements relating to ISO/IEC 27001

A.8 Technological Controls(6 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.11Sensitive data obfuscation techniques2 targets
ISO27701-19Data protection officer designation
ISO27701-21Data protection impact assessments
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management
ISO27701-13Encryption of personal data
ISO27001-A.8.25Security-integrated development lifecycle
ISO27701-18Regular security testing and assessment
ISO27001-A.8.26Application-level security requirements
ISO27701-18Regular security testing and assessment
ISO27001-A.8.29Security validation in development and acceptance
ISO27701-18Regular security testing and assessment

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 27701?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while ISO 27701 covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 33 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct ISO 27701 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 27701?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 11 map directly to ISO 27701 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 84 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to ISO 27701?

84 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27701. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 27701?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.