NIST Privacy FrameworkvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how NIST Privacy Framework controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST Privacy Framework maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST Privacy Framework controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect-P Data Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Identify-P(3 mappings)
Control-P(1 mappings)
Communicate-P(1 mappings)
Protect-P Access(6 mappings)
Protect-P Maintenance and Technology(1 mappings)
Protect-P Processes(8 mappings)
+1 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST Privacy Framework comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST Privacy Framework and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
NIST Privacy Framework has 8 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect-P Data Security, where 1 NIST Privacy Framework controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST Privacy Framework and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 8 total NIST Privacy Framework controls, 6 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Privacy Framework to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
2 NIST Privacy Framework controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect-P Data Security with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Privacy Framework and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is Protect-P Data Security (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.