TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment ExchangevsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 38% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Information Security(19 mappings)
Assessment and Exchange(1 mappings)
+23 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange has 47 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 24 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 47 total TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls, 18 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
29 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.