TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 43% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(6 mappings)

ASD37-06Email content filtering (Excellent)
→CPG-7.BIncident Reporting to CISA
ASD37-12Antivirus software with heuristics (Very Good)
→CPG-7.BIncident Reporting to CISA
ASD37-16Antivirus software with signatures (Limited)
→CPG-7.BIncident Reporting to CISA
ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)3 targets
→CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(14 mappings)

ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
→CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)5 targets
→CPG-1.ADefault Password Change
→CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
→CPG-1.DMulti-Factor Authentication for Remote Access
→CPG-4.CCybersecurity Awareness Training
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)2 targets
→CPG-1.DMulti-Factor Authentication for Remote Access
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)3 targets
→CPG-1.ADefault Password Change
→CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
→CPG-4.CCybersecurity Awareness Training
ASD37-25Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)2 targets
→CPG-1.DMulti-Factor Authentication for Remote Access
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)
→CPG-3.CSecure Sensitive Data Collection

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange18 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.023 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.023 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.021 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.020 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 13 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 16 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

21 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.