TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsSOC 2

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
71
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to SOC 2 with 15% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 81 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(12 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
→SOC2-CC8.1Change management processes are in place
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement2 targets
→SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
→SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards3 targets
→SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
→SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
→SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed

A.7 Physical Controls(2 mappings)

ISO27001-A.7.1Defined secure zones and boundaries
→SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical surveillance and monitoring
→SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets

A.8 Technological Controls(6 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.13Backup strategy and recovery assurance2 targets
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
ISO27001-A.8.14Processing infrastructure high availability3 targets
→SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
→SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
→SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs CSA CCM v430 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange26 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)24 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements23 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation22 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappings

Other SOC 2 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC 213 mappingsSSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC 212 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC 211 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs SOC 211 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs SOC 211 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs SOC 211 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs SOC 211 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 32 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 14 map directly to SOC 2 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 81 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to SOC 2?

81 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.