TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsSOC 2

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

177
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
76%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to SOC 2 with 76% coverage across 72 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 820K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 177 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 820K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(20 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.1Information security policy management
→SOC2-CC5.3COSO principle 12: Deploys control activities through policies and procedures
ISO27001-A.5.11Asset retrieval upon role change or exit3 targets
→SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
ISO27001-A.5.13Sensitivity marking and labelling practices
→SOC2-C1.1Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage
ISO27001-A.5.14Secure data exchange procedures2 targets
→SOC2-C1.1Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage
→SOC2-CC6.7Transmission of data is restricted to authorized users
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
ISO27001-A.5.18Access entitlement provisioning and review3 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
→SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
→SOC2-P5.1Personal information is accessed only by authorized personnel
ISO27001-A.5.2Security roles and accountability assignments3 targets
→SOC2-CC1.3COSO principle 3: Management establishes structures, reporting lines, and authorities
→SOC2-CC1.5COSO principle 5: Holds individuals accountable for internal control responsibilities
→SOC2-CC2.2COSO principle 14: Internally communicates information including objectives and responsibilities
ISO27001-A.5.21ICT supply chain security oversight
→SOC2-CC9.2Risk mitigation activities include assessment of vendor and business partner controls
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
→SOC2-CC8.1Change management processes are in place
ISO27001-A.5.23Cloud service security governance4 targets
→SOC2-CC3.2COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed
→SOC2-CC5.2COSO principle 11: Selects and develops general controls over technology
→SOC2-CC6.6Measures against threats outside system boundaries are implemented
→SOC2-CC9.2Risk mitigation activities include assessment of vendor and business partner controls

+157 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs CSA CCM v488 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 578 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PCI DSS v4.070 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)67 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.066 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs DORA57 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs GDPR42 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange26 mappings

Other SOC 2 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC 213 mappingsSSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SOC 213 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC 212 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC 211 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs SOC 211 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs SOC 211 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs SOC 211 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs SOC 211 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (820K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 72 overlapping controls (76% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 11 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 72 map directly to SOC 2 controls — representing 76% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to SOC 2?

23 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.