Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 52% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(3 mappings)

27011-1Scope
AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
27011-3Terms and definitions
AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
27400-3Terms and definitions
AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(3 mappings)

27011-5.2Information security roles and responsibilities
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
27011-5.3Segregation of duties2 targets
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls

Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(3 mappings)

27011-6.3Information security awareness, education and training3 targets
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)

27011-7.1Physical security perimeters
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
27011-7.3Equipment protection
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(9 mappings)

27011-8.1User endpoint devices and privileged access3 targets
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
AWWA-2.1User Access Management
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
27011-8.2Network security and segregation
AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
27011-8.3Cryptography and key management2 targets
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
AWWA-4.1Malware Protection
27011-8.6Data protection and backup
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 27 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications, where 4 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 27 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 14 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

13 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.