TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 43% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(12 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection3 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest3 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity3 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Incident Response and Media Protection(8 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition3 targets
→CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
3.5Securely Dispose of Data2 targets
→CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting
→CPG-6.AVendor and Supplier Incident Reporting

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 27001:202217 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 1348516 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 9 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 15 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

20 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.