NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile DevicesvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 26% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Mobile Device Security Controls(10 mappings)
Mobile Device Policies(10 mappings)
+6 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices has 34 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Controls, where 5 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 34 total NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls, 9 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
25 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.