TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

202
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
69%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 69% coverage across 66 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 820K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 202 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 820K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(20 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.1Information security policy management2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Cybersecurity risk management policy is established based on context and strategy
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02Policy is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced
ISO27001-A.5.11Asset retrieval upon role change or exit3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-04Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-03Hardware is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk
ISO27001-A.5.14Secure data exchange procedures
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-02The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-transit are protected
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management2 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
ISO27001-A.5.18Access entitlement provisioning and review2 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
ISO27001-A.5.2Security roles and accountability assignments
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles and responsibilities for cybersecurity risk management are established
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
ISO27001-A.5.21ICT supply chain security oversight3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-03Supply chain risk management is integrated into risk management
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-04Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality

+182 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs CSA CCM v488 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 578 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 272 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PCI DSS v4.070 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)67 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs DORA57 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs GDPR42 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange26 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (820K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 103 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 66 overlapping controls (69% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 12 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 66 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 69% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

29 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.