OWASP Top 10:2025vsHL7 FHIR Security Framework
See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 42% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Defensive Programming.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 11 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.
Authorisation(3 mappings)
Authorization and Access Control(9 mappings)
Cryptography(3 mappings)
Secure Design(2 mappings)
Cryptography and Data Protection(2 mappings)
Supply Chain(1 mappings)
+17 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 719 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons
Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 719 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
OWASP Top 10:2025 has 19 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Defensive Programming, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
Of 19 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 14 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
14 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Defensive Programming with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is Defensive Programming (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.