TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsNIST Privacy Framework

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to NIST Privacy Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
70%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to NIST Privacy Framework with 70% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Access Control(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control3 targets
→NISTPF-3Control-P - Privacy Controls, Data Management, and Disassociated Processing
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Cryptography(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management2 targets
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Injection(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-3A03:2025 Injection Including Cross-Site Scripting
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Component Security(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components2 targets
→NISTPF-3Control-P - Privacy Controls, Data Management, and Disassociated Processing
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)

Authentication(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)

Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs FedRAMP Rev 57 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)6 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISO/IEC 27011:20246 mappings

Other NIST Privacy Framework comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsUSMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST Privacy Framework?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 10 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (70% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST Privacy Framework?

Of 10 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 7 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework controls — representing 70% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to NIST Privacy Framework?

3 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST Privacy Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.