Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsISO/IEC 27400:2022

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
70%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 70% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control(5 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control5 targets
27011-1Scope
27011-3Terms and definitions
27400-3Terms and definitions
27400-6.1Secure Device Design
27400-6.1Secure Device Design

Cryptography(6 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management6 targets
27400-6.1Secure Device Design
27400-6.1Secure Device Design
27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
27400-6.4Default Configuration Security
27400-6.4Default Configuration Security

Secure Design(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)2 targets
27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication
27400-6.2Device Identity and Authentication

Component Security(4 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components4 targets
27400-5.1IoT Security and Privacy Governance
27400-5.1IoT Security and Privacy Governance
27400-6.1Secure Device Design
27400-6.1Secure Device Design

Authentication(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures2 targets
27400-6.1Secure Device Design
27400-6.1Secure Device Design

Integrity(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-8A08:2025 Software and Data Integrity Failures
27400-6.3Secure Update Mechanism

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 10 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (70% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

Of 10 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 70% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

3 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.