OWASP Top 10:2025vsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)
See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) with 31% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain and Dependencies.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Authorization and Access Control(9 mappings)
Design and Architecture(3 mappings)
Authentication and Session Management(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons
Other CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
OWASP Top 10:2025 has 16 controls across its framework, while CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain and Dependencies, where 4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) equivalent.
How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
Of 16 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 5 map directly to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
11 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024). The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain and Dependencies with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain and Dependencies (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.