TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) with 60% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Logging and Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control(6 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control6 targets
→CWE-200Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
→CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (Path Traversal)
→CWE-269Improper Privilege Management
→CWE-352Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
→CWE-862Missing Authorization
→CWE-863Incorrect Authorization

SSRF(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-10A10:2025 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
→CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Injection(6 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-3A03:2025 Injection Including Cross-Site Scripting6 targets
→CWE-20Improper Input Validation
→CWE-77Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (Command Injection)
→CWE-78Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (OS Command Injection)
→CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (Cross-site Scripting)
→CWE-89Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (SQL Injection)
→CWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection)

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→CWE-434Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type

Authentication(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures3 targets
→CWE-287Improper Authentication
→CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function
→CWE-798Use of Hard-coded Credentials

Integrity(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-8A08:2025 Software and Data Integrity Failures
→CWE-502Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs FedRAMP Rev 57 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISO/IEC 27011:20246 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 10 controls across its framework, while CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Logging and Monitoring, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?

Of 10 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 6 map directly to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?

4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024). The highest concentration of gaps is in Logging and Monitoring with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Logging and Monitoring (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.