OWASP ASVSvsHL7 FHIR Security Framework
See exactly how OWASP ASVS controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OWASP ASVS maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 36% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 OWASP ASVS controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
V2 Authentication(1 mappings)
V4 Access Control(1 mappings)
V6 Cryptography at Rest(1 mappings)
V7 Error Handling and Logging(2 mappings)
V9 Communication(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other OWASP ASVS comparisons
Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OWASP ASVS and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
OWASP ASVS has 14 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling, where 1 OWASP ASVS controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between OWASP ASVS and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
Of 14 total OWASP ASVS controls, 5 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP ASVS to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
9 OWASP ASVS controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP ASVS and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.