Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP ASVSvsHL7 FHIR Security Framework

See exactly how OWASP ASVS controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP ASVS maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 18% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 OWASP ASVS controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OWASP ASVS: Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

OWASP ASVS: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)

ASVS-04Roles and responsibilities definition
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization

OWASP ASVS: Access Control(12 mappings)

ASVS-11Access control policy and enforcement2 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
ASVS-12User access management and provisioning2 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
ASVS-13Authentication and password management5 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FHIR-SEC-2.1User Authentication
FHIR-SEC-2.3System-to-System Authentication
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
ASVS-14Privileged access management3 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
FHIR-SEC-2.2SMART App Launch
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization

OWASP ASVS: Cryptography(6 mappings)

ASVS-16Cryptographic policy and key management2 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security
ASVS-18Encryption of data in transit2 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security
ASVS-20Key lifecycle management2 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security

OWASP ASVS: Operations Security(1 mappings)

ASVS-24Logging and monitoring
FHIR-SEC-1.2Time Keeping

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP ASVS and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

OWASP ASVS has 49 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OWASP ASVS: Communications Security, where 5 OWASP ASVS controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP ASVS and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

Of 49 total OWASP ASVS controls, 9 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP ASVS to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

40 OWASP ASVS controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in OWASP ASVS: Communications Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP ASVS and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is OWASP ASVS: Communications Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.