TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

55
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 62% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain and Dependencies.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 55 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authorization and Access Control(20 mappings)

A01:2025Broken Access Control7 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→FEDRAMP-CA-1Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring Policy
→FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-3Account management
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration9 targets
→CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→FEDRAMP-PS-4Personnel Termination
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
→NIS2-IA-12Multi-Factor Authentication
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control4 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls

+35 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)11 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CSA CCM v411 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts11 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.011 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs South Korea ISMS-P11 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security11 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)10 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)10 mappings

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs FedRAMP Rev 537 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 16 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain and Dependencies, where 2 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 16 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 10 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to FedRAMP Rev 5?

6 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain and Dependencies with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain and Dependencies (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.