TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
70%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 70% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
→FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation

Cryptography(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management2 targets
→FedRAMP-BaselinesFedRAMP Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters
→FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation

Injection(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-3A03:2025 Injection Including Cross-Site Scripting
→FedRAMP-SupplyChain-SBOMFedRAMP supply chain risk management + SBOM (per EO 14028 + NIST 800-218 SSDF)

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→FedRAMP-BaselinesFedRAMP Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters

Component Security(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
→FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation

Authentication(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
→FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation

Logging and Monitoring(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures3 targets
→FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation
→FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests
→FedRAMP-IncidentReportingFedRAMP incident reporting to PMO and US-CERT

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)6 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISO/IEC 27011:20246 mappings

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FedRAMP Rev 55 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs FedRAMP Rev 55 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs FedRAMP Rev 55 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs FedRAMP Rev 55 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs FedRAMP Rev 55 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs FedRAMP Rev 55 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs FedRAMP Rev 55 mappingsVietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FedRAMP Rev 54 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 10 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (70% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 10 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 7 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 70% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to FedRAMP Rev 5?

3 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.