TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsISO/IEC 27011:2024

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to ISO/IEC 27011:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 with 60% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control(6 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control6 targets
→27011-1Scope
→27011-3Terms and definitions
→27011-5.3Segregation of duties
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→27400-3Terms and definitions

Cryptography(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
→27011-8.3Cryptography and key management

Injection(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-3A03:2025 Injection Including Cross-Site Scripting
→27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→27011-8.3Cryptography and key management

Component Security(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components3 targets
→27011-5.4Threat intelligence for telecom
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices

Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
→27011-8.4Logging and monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs FedRAMP Rev 57 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)6 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

ISO 27002:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202418 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ISO/IEC 27011:202414 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 10 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27011:2024 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27011:2024 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

Of 10 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27011:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.