Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
70%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts with 70% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
NIS2I-6Access Control, Asset Management, and Physical Security

Cryptography(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management2 targets
NIS2I-5Cyber Hygiene, Training, Cryptography, and Human Resources Security
NIS2I-6Access Control, Asset Management, and Physical Security

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
NIS2I-5Cyber Hygiene, Training, Cryptography, and Human Resources Security

Component Security(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
NIS2I-6Access Control, Asset Management, and Physical Security

Authentication(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
NIS2I-6Access Control, Asset Management, and Physical Security

Integrity(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-8A08:2025 Software and Data Integrity Failures
NIS2I-7Network Security, Logging, Monitoring, and Vulnerability Handling

Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
NIS2I-3Incident Handling Policy, Reporting Significance Criteria, and Business Continuity

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 10 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (70% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

Of 10 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 7 map directly to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls — representing 70% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

3 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.