Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
69%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts with 69% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain and Dependencies.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authorization and Access Control(20 mappings)

A01:2025Broken Access Control6 targets
AEO-SC-3Premises Security
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
ICS-AC-3Account management
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration5 targets
CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
NIS2-IA-12Multi-Factor Authentication
NIS2-IA-14Cryptography and Encryption
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control5 targets
AEO-SC-3Premises Security
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization4 targets
FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
ICS-AC-3Account management

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 16 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (69% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain and Dependencies, where 2 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

Of 16 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 11 map directly to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls — representing 69% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

5 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain and Dependencies with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain and Dependencies (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.