Cross-Framework Mapping

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board SystemsvsHL7 FHIR Security Framework

See exactly how IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 16% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

IACS UR E26 Detect(2 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Detect-Logging-Monitoring-Audit-AlertingIACS UR E26 Detect Goal - Logging + Network Monitoring + Audit Trail + Alerting + SIEM2 targets
HL7-FHIR-Audit-Provenance-DigitalSignatures-IntegrityHL7 FHIR Audit + Provenance + Digital Signatures + AuditEvent Resource + Audit Log Integrity + Retention
HL7-FHIR-Transport-TLS-CommunicationHL7 FHIR Transport Security - TLS 1.2+, Communication Security, Time Keeping, Server CapabilityStatement

IACS UR E27 User Auth(1 mappings)

IACS-UR-E27-Equipment-UserAuth-Authentication-AuthorizationIACS UR E27 - Equipment User Authentication + Authorization + Session Management + Privileged Access
HL7-FHIR-Auth-SMART-OAuth-OIDC-BackendHL7 FHIR Authentication - SMART App Launch + OAuth 2.0 + OpenID Connect + Backend Services + Token Lifetime

IACS UR E27 Logging + Forensics(2 mappings)

IACS-UR-E27-Logging-Forensics-EventCaptureIACS UR E27 - Equipment Logging + Forensic Readiness + Event Capture + Tamper Detection2 targets
HL7-FHIR-Audit-Provenance-DigitalSignatures-IntegrityHL7 FHIR Audit + Provenance + Digital Signatures + AuditEvent Resource + Audit Log Integrity + Retention
HL7-FHIR-Transport-TLS-CommunicationHL7 FHIR Transport Security - TLS 1.2+, Communication Security, Time Keeping, Server CapabilityStatement

Related Comparisons

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems has 19 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval, where 1 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

Of 19 total IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls, 3 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

16 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.