NIST SP 800-61vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how NIST SP 800-61 controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-61 maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-61 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.
Policy, Plan, Procedures(2 mappings)
Team Structure and Staffing(1 mappings)
Preparation - Capability Build(5 mappings)
Detection and Analysis(4 mappings)
Containment, Eradication, Recovery(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-61 comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 700 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-61 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
NIST SP 800-61 has 8 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel, where 1 NIST SP 800-61 controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-61 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 8 total NIST SP 800-61 controls, 5 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-61 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
3 NIST SP 800-61 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-61 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.