TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-61vsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how NIST SP 800-61 controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-61 maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-61 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Team Structure and Staffing(1 mappings)

NISTSP61-2Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) Structure and Staffing
→OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control

Preparation - Capability Build(2 mappings)

NISTSP61-3Preparation: Communications, Toolkits, Training, Exercises, Threat Intelligence2 targets
→OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
→OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)

Detection and Analysis(1 mappings)

NISTSP61-4Detection and Analysis: Sources, Triage, Categorisation, Prioritisation
→OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

Containment, Eradication, Recovery(4 mappings)

NISTSP61-5Containment, Eradication, and Recovery4 targets
→OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
→OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
→OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
→OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-61 comparisons

NIST SP 800-61 vs OWASP ASVS5 mappingsNIST SP 800-61 vs ISO 19650 - Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappingsNIST SP 800-61 vs ISO 270435 mappingsNIST SP 800-61 vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices5 mappingsNIST SP 800-61 vs ISO/SAE 214345 mappingsNIST SP 800-61 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.05 mappingsNIST SP 800-61 vs OWASP MASVS5 mappingsNIST SP 800-61 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)4 mappings

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs OWASP Top 10:202510 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs OWASP Top 10:202510 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs OWASP Top 10:202510 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs OWASP Top 10:20259 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-61 and OWASP Top 10:2025?

NIST SP 800-61 has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel, where 1 NIST SP 800-61 controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-61 and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-61 controls, 4 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-61 to OWASP Top 10:2025?

4 NIST SP 800-61 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-61 and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.