Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-61vsISO 27043

See exactly how NIST SP 800-61 controls map to ISO 27043. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-61 maps to ISO 27043 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-61 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Policy, Plan, Procedures(3 mappings)

NISTSP61-1Incident Response Policy, Plan, and Procedures3 targets
ISO27043-06Asset inventory and ownership
ISO27043-08Information classification and labeling
ISO27043-10Media management and disposal

Team Structure and Staffing(1 mappings)

NISTSP61-2Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) Structure and Staffing
ISO27043-04Roles and responsibilities definition

Preparation - Capability Build(7 mappings)

NISTSP61-3Preparation: Communications, Toolkits, Training, Exercises, Threat Intelligence7 targets
ISO27043-06Asset inventory and ownership
ISO27043-08Information classification and labeling
ISO27043-10Media management and disposal
ISO27043-17Encryption of data at rest
ISO27043-18Encryption of data in transit
ISO27043-19Certificate management
ISO27043-20Key lifecycle management

Detection and Analysis(5 mappings)

NISTSP61-4Detection and Analysis: Sources, Triage, Categorisation, Prioritisation5 targets
ISO27043-06Asset inventory and ownership
ISO27043-08Information classification and labeling
ISO27043-10Media management and disposal
ISO27043-24Logging and monitoring
ISO27043-27Network security management

Containment, Eradication, Recovery(4 mappings)

NISTSP61-5Containment, Eradication, and Recovery4 targets
ISO27043-11Access control policy and enforcement
ISO27043-12User access management and provisioning
ISO27043-13Authentication and password management
ISO27043-14Privileged access management

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-61 and ISO 27043?

NIST SP 800-61 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 27043 covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel, where 1 NIST SP 800-61 controls have no direct ISO 27043 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-61 and ISO 27043?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-61 controls, 5 map directly to ISO 27043 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-61 to ISO 27043?

3 NIST SP 800-61 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27043. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-61 and ISO 27043?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud, Third-Party, Threat Intel (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.