TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
85
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 16% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 89 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.

DE - Detect(4 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and other contextual information are integrated into the analysis
→IAEA-NSS17-Assurance-Regulator-Inspection-Reporting-ImprovementIAEA NSS-17 - Assurance Activities + Regulator Interface + Inspection + Reporting + Information Sharing + Continuous Improvement
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria3 targets
→IAEA-NSS17-AccessControl-OT-IT-Authentication-AuthorizationIAEA NSS-17 - Access Control + Authentication + Authorization + IAM + Privileged Access for OT and IT
→IAEA-NSS17-Architecture-Zones-DefenceInDepth-SegmentationIAEA NSS-17 - Computer Security Architecture + Zone Model + Defence in Depth + Network Segmentation + Boundary
→IAEA-NSS17-SupplyChain-ThirdParty-OEM-TrustIAEA NSS-17 - Supply Chain + Third Party + OEM + Vendor Security + Trustworthy Components

GV - Govern(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational cybersecurity risk discussions
→IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
→IAEA-NSS17-SupplyChain-ThirdParty-OEM-TrustIAEA NSS-17 - Supply Chain + Third Party + OEM + Vendor Security + Trustworthy Components

ID - Identify(5 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→IAEA-NSS17-SupplyChain-ThirdParty-OEM-TrustIAEA NSS-17 - Supply Chain + Third Party + OEM + Vendor Security + Trustworthy Components
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
→IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums and sources
→IAEA-NSS17-Assurance-Regulator-Inspection-Reporting-ImprovementIAEA NSS-17 - Assurance Activities + Regulator Interface + Inspection + Reporting + Information Sharing + Continuous Improvement
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use
→IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition
→IAEA-NSS17-SupplyChain-ThirdParty-OEM-TrustIAEA NSS-17 - Supply Chain + Third Party + OEM + Vendor Security + Trustworthy Components

PR - Protect(6 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties3 targets
→IAEA-NSS17-AccessControl-OT-IT-Authentication-AuthorizationIAEA NSS-17 - Access Control + Authentication + Authorization + IAM + Privileged Access for OT and IT
→IAEA-NSS17-Architecture-Zones-DefenceInDepth-SegmentationIAEA NSS-17 - Computer Security Architecture + Zone Model + Defence in Depth + Network Segmentation + Boundary
→IAEA-NSS17-SupplyChain-ThirdParty-OEM-TrustIAEA NSS-17 - Supply Chain + Third Party + OEM + Vendor Security + Trustworthy Components
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced commensurate with risk
→IAEA-NSS17-Scope-NSS-Family-CSP-EstablishmentIAEA NSS-17 + NSS-42-G - Scope + Nuclear Security Series Family + Computer Security Programme Establishment + Roles + Management System Integration
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
→IAEA-NSS17-SystemIntegrity-Configuration-Change-ManagementIAEA NSS-17 - System Integrity + Configuration Management + Change Management + Baseline + Hardening
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
→IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises

RC - Recover(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
→IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06The end of incident recovery is declared based on criteria, and incident-related documentation is completed
→IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises

RS - Respond(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared
→IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 692 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls your existing NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 16% in the header counts how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5106 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP Moderate104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP High104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs SOC 2104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Information Security Manual103 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 692 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 26 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 17 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, representing 16% coverage. The remaining 89 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

89 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 26 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (26 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.