Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsCSA CCM v4

Name: NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to CSA CCM v4 Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

20%

Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to CSA CCM v4 with 20% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 103 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 82 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 103 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 57 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

GV - Govern(11 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk2 targets

→CSA-CEK-06Encryption risk management

→CSA-GRC-02Risk management program

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established2 targets

→CSA-CEK-06Encryption risk management

→CSA-GRC-02Risk management program

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments2 targets

→CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis

→CSA-DSP-09Data protection impact assessment

NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established5 targets

→CSA-CEK-06Encryption risk management

→CSA-GRC-02Risk management program

→CSA-STA-04Supply chain data security assessment

→CSA-STA-07Supply chain due diligence

→CSA-STA-14Supply chain metrics

ID - Identify(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained3 targets

→CSA-STA-04Supply chain data security assessment

→CSA-STA-07Supply chain due diligence

→CSA-STA-14Supply chain metrics

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained3 targets

→CSA-LOG-02Security incident management

→CSA-SEF-02Service management policy and procedures

→CSA-SEF-03Incident response plans

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified2 targets

→CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis

→CSA-DSP-09Data protection impact assessment

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk

→CSA-STA-04Supply chain data security assessment

+37 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA CCM v446 mappings PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA CCM v443 mappings New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs CSA CCM v443 mappings FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CSA CCM v443 mappings Oman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA CCM v443 mappings NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs CSA CCM v442 mappings Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs CSA CCM v442 mappings MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CSA CCM v442 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 693 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$49/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and CSA CCM v4?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 103 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and CSA CCM v4?

Of 103 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 21 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 82 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to CSA CCM v4?

82 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.