TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
53%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 53% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Threat and Vulnerability Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(3 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→NSS17-6.3Information Sharing

Data Security and Privacy(3 mappings)

CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

Infrastructure and Operations Security(11 mappings)

CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
→NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring
CSA-INF-04Incident Management5 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery4 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)14 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs BIMCO Cyber Security12 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CAIQ (CSA)12 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (53% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Threat and Vulnerability Management, where 4 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 8 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 53% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

7 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Threat and Vulnerability Management with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Threat and Vulnerability Management (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.