TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
84
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct with 14% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 91 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

GV - Govern(6 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon2 targets
→BMA-2Proportionality Principle
→BMA-3Operational Cyber Risk Management Programme
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01Organizational leadership is responsible for cybersecurity risk management3 targets
→BMA-12Board and Senior Management Oversight
→BMA-4Chief Information Security Officer
→BMA-5Three Lines of Defence
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→BMA-8Third-Party, Outsourcing and Cloud Risk

ID - Identify(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-01Inventories of hardware managed by the organization are maintained
→BMA-13Asset Inventory
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded2 targets
→BMA-21Security Testing Programme
→BMA-6Risk Assessment Process

PR - Protect(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→BMA-16Access Management and Segregation of Duties
NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided awareness and training to perform cybersecurity duties
→BMA-17Staff Cyber Risk Awareness Training
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected3 targets
→BMA-18Data Classification and Security
→BMA-19Data Protection, Governance and Loss Prevention
→BMA-25Use of Cryptography
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized access
→BMA-24Network Security Management
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied2 targets
→BMA-22Patch Management
→BMA-9Information Technology Services Management
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-05Installation and execution of unauthorized software is prevented
→BMA-20Malicious Code Controls

RC - Recover(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→BMA-26Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning

RS - Respond(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents
→BMA-15Notification of Cyber Reporting Events to the Authority

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements19 mappings

Other Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct4 mappingsAPI 1164 vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct4 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct3 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct3 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct3 mappingsISO/IEC 27031:2011 vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct3 mappingsISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct3 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 25 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 15 map directly to Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 91 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct?

91 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.