TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 62% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(5 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control2 targets
→NSS17-1.1Computer Security Policy
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring
→NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management
→NSS17-4.4Configuration Management
NIST82-CTL-07OT Backup and Recovery
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity

OT Incident Response(8 mappings)

NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
NIST82-IR-02OT Anomaly Detection
→NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring
NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment4 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
NIST82-IR-04OT System Recovery
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity
NIST82-IR-05OT Forensics
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response

OT System Overview and Threats(5 mappings)

NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment3 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

OT Risk Management(2 mappings)

NIST82-RM-02OT Security Program Management2 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Security Controls, where 3 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 13 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

8 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Security Controls with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Security Controls (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.