TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 33% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management(7 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

Cybersecurity Governance(13 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment3 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
→NSS17-6.3Information Sharing
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 45 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 12 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 45 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 15 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

30 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.