TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
58
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security with 21% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 103 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 81 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 103 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

DE - Detect(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria2 targets
→NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
→NIST82-RM-02OT Security Program Management

GV - Govern(6 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments2 targets
→NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
→NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established2 targets
→NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
→NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework

ID - Identify(7 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained3 targets
→NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning
→NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
→NIST82-IR-05OT Forensics
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified2 targets
→NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
→NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
→NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment

PR - Protect(5 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed2 targets
→NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management
→NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions2 targets
→NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management
→NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202220 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP Rev 519 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsIEC 62443 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsDO-326A / ED-202A vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 103 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

Of 103 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 22 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 81 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

81 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.