TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

43
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 36% coverage across 23 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(11 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection2 targets
→NSS17-1.1Computer Security Policy
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→NSS17-4.4Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→NSS17-4.4Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup4 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity

Access Control and Authentication(9 mappings)

FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls2 targets
→NSS17-1.1Computer Security Policy
→NSS17-4.1Access Control

+23 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

FedRAMP Rev 5 vs South Korea ISMS-P37 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation35 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange35 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CSA CCM v434 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)34 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)33 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security33 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments33 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 64 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 23 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control and Authentication, where 14 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 64 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 23 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

41 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control and Authentication with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control and Authentication (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.