TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial InstitutionsvsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 47% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(15 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment3 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
→NSS17-6.3Information Sharing
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

Security Operations(4 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection2 targets
→NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring
→NSS17-6.3Information Sharing
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery2 targets
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity

Related Comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202413 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)12 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions has 19 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 9 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 19 total Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls, 9 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

10 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.