TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
46%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 46% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 3: Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Domain 1: Governance(6 mappings)

CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security

Domain 2: Identification(2 mappings)

CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

Domain 3: Protection(2 mappings)

CRAF-3.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security
→NSS17-4.4Configuration Management

Domain 4: Detection(2 mappings)

CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence
→NSS17-6.3Information Sharing
CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection
→NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring

Domain 5: Response and Recovery(3 mappings)

CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience
→NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity

Domain 6: Situational Awareness(1 mappings)

CRAF-6.1Cyber Threat Landscape Monitoring
→NSS17-6.3Information Sharing

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.014 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs RBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)13 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 3: Protection, where 4 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 11 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

13 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 3: Protection with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 3: Protection (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.