TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
73%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 73% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IAEA NSS-17 Access Control(2 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-AccessControl-OT-IT-Authentication-AuthorizationIAEA NSS-17 - Access Control + Authentication + Authorization + IAM + Privileged Access for OT and IT2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

IAEA NSS-17 Architecture + Zones(2 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-Architecture-Zones-DefenceInDepth-SegmentationIAEA NSS-17 - Computer Security Architecture + Zone Model + Defence in Depth + Network Segmentation + Boundary2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement(2 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-Assurance-Regulator-Inspection-Reporting-ImprovementIAEA NSS-17 - Assurance Activities + Regulator Interface + Inspection + Reporting + Information Sharing + Continuous Improvement2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums

IAEA NSS-17 Detect + IR + Recovery(6 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises6 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied

IAEA NSS-17 Graded Approach + Security Levels + Risk + DBT(2 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified

IAEA NSS-17 Scope + CSP Establishment(1 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-Scope-NSS-Family-CSP-EstablishmentIAEA NSS-17 + NSS-42-G - Scope + Nuclear Security Series Family + Computer Security Programme Establishment + Roles + Management System Integration
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced

IAEA NSS-17 Supply Chain + Third Party(5 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-SupplyChain-ThirdParty-OEM-TrustIAEA NSS-17 - Supply Chain + Third Party + OEM + Vendor Security + Trustworthy Components5 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20246 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-1466 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (73% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface, where 1 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 11 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 8 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 73% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

3 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.