TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
54%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 54% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue4 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management5 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification2 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) comparisons

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs CSA CCM v418 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity17 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)16 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs ISO 27001:202216 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management16 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) has 28 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 103 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 8 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 28 total South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls, 15 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 54% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

13 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.