TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 45% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Computer Security Architecture.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Assessment and Management(2 mappings)

NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment
NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
→CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment

Computer Security Architecture(2 mappings)

NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones2 targets
→CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
→CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities

Protective Measures(6 mappings)

NSS17-4.1Access Control3 targets
→CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
→CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities
→CRAF-3.1Access Control
NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security2 targets
→CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
→CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities
NSS17-4.4Configuration Management
→CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security

Monitoring, Response and Recovery(4 mappings)

NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring
→CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection
NSS17-5.2Incident Response2 targets
→CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
→CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity
→CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience

Competent Authority Responsibilities(2 mappings)

NSS17-6.3Information Sharing2 targets
→CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence
→CRAF-6.1Cyber Threat Landscape Monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.011 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs FedRAMP Rev 510 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions9 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation9 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)9 mappings

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 22 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Computer Security Architecture, where 3 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Of 22 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 10 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

12 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in Computer Security Architecture with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Computer Security Architecture (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.