TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment ExchangevsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 29% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls identifies 20 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Technical and Operational Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 894 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 894 frameworks.

People and Third Parties(5 mappings)

TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management5 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition

Information Security Management(6 mappings)

TISAX-ISM-02Risk Management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
TISAX-ISM-04Supplier and Third-Party Management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition

Technical and Operational Security(9 mappings)

TISAX-TECH-01Access Control and Identity Management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
TISAX-TECH-03Operations and Communications Security3 targets
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06The end of incident recovery is declared based on criteria, and incident-related documentation is completed
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05The criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
TISAX-TECH-04Incident Management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 894 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls your existing TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 29% in the header counts how many TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange comparisons

TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 510 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs South Korea ISMS-P10 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)10 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO/IEC 27011:20249 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.09 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices9 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management8 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems8 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0106 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsFedRAMP High vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsSOC 2 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsAustralian Information Security Manual vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0103 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0103 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0103 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 894 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 894 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange has 28 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical and Operational Security, where 7 TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 28 total TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls, 8 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, representing 29% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

20 TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical and Operational Security with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technical and Operational Security (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.