TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
58%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 58% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 3: Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Domain 1: Governance(10 mappings)

CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy5 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

Domain 2: Identification(2 mappings)

CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified

Domain 3: Protection(5 mappings)

CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
CRAF-3.4Application Security
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06Secure software development practices are integrated throughout the SDLC
CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

Domain 4: Detection(3 mappings)

CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums
CRAF-4.3Security Testing
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06Secure software development practices are integrated throughout the SDLC

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs RBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)13 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)13 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 103 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 3: Protection, where 3 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 14 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

10 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 3: Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 3: Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.