TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 41% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Computer Security Architecture.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Assessment and Management(4 mappings)

NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment2 targets
→AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
→CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
→AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
→CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Computer Security Architecture(2 mappings)

NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones2 targets
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Protective Measures(5 mappings)

NSS17-4.1Access Control3 targets
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security2 targets
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Monitoring, Response and Recovery(5 mappings)

NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring
→CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
NSS17-5.2Incident Response
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity3 targets
→CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Competent Authority Responsibilities(1 mappings)

NSS17-6.3Information Sharing
→AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.011 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs FedRAMP Rev 510 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions9 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation9 mappings

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 22 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Computer Security Architecture, where 3 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 22 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 9 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

13 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Computer Security Architecture with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Computer Security Architecture (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.