Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
76%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 76% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(12 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control2 targets
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management2 targets
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management3 targets
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
NIST82-CTL-07OT Backup and Recovery3 targets
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied

OT Incident Response(8 mappings)

NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning3 targets
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
NIST82-IR-02OT Anomaly Detection
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment4 targets
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 103 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (76% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Risk Management, where 2 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 16 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 76% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

5 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Risk Management with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Risk Management (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.