TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines with 45% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Competent Authority Responsibilities.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Computer Security Programme(1 mappings)

NSS17-1.1Computer Security Policy
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls

Risk Assessment and Management(2 mappings)

NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→ICS-RA-3Risk assessment methodology
NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
→ICS-RA-3Risk assessment methodology

Computer Security Architecture(2 mappings)

NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones2 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management

Protective Measures(8 mappings)

NSS17-4.1Access Control5 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security2 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
NSS17-4.4Configuration Management
→ICS-PM-2System hardening

Monitoring, Response and Recovery(7 mappings)

NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring
→ICS-NS-5Network monitoring and intrusion detection
NSS17-5.2Incident Response3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
NSS17-5.3Recovery and Continuity3 targets
→AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.011 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs FedRAMP Rev 510 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions9 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation9 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)9 mappings

Other CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines23 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines23 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines21 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines21 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 22 controls across its framework, while CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Competent Authority Responsibilities, where 3 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

Of 22 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 10 map directly to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

12 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. The highest concentration of gaps is in Competent Authority Responsibilities with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

The domain with the highest gap count is Competent Authority Responsibilities (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.