TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

43
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 45% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Competent Authority Responsibilities.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Computer Security Programme(4 mappings)

NSS17-1.1Computer Security Policy4 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
→FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls

Risk Assessment and Management(2 mappings)

NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→FEDRAMP-RA-3Risk Assessment
NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
→FEDRAMP-RA-3Risk Assessment

Computer Security Architecture(7 mappings)

NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones7 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
→FEDRAMP-AU-2Event Logging
→FEDRAMP-AU-6Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→FEDRAMP-RA-5Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

Protective Measures(7 mappings)

NSS17-4.1Access Control7 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
→FEDRAMP-AU-2Event Logging
→FEDRAMP-AU-6Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

+23 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.011 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions9 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation9 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)9 mappings

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs FedRAMP Rev 537 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and FedRAMP Rev 5?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 22 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Competent Authority Responsibilities, where 3 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 22 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 10 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to FedRAMP Rev 5?

12 IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Competent Authority Responsibilities with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Competent Authority Responsibilities (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.