Cross-Framework Mapping

Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of ConductvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

36
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 67% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identification of Assets and Risks.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 36 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Detect and Protect Controls(5 mappings)

BMA-10Threat Intelligence and Vulnerability Alerting2 targets
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums
BMA-9IT Services Management3 targets
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

Response and Recovery(15 mappings)

BMA-12Incident Response Plan3 targets
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
BMA-13Business Continuity and Recovery3 targets
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
BMA-14Cyber Insurance3 targets
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
CPG-7.AIncident Response Plan3 targets
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
CPG-7.CSystem Backups3 targets
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied

+16 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct has 18 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 103 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identification of Assets and Risks, where 2 Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 18 total Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct controls, 12 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

6 Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identification of Assets and Risks with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identification of Assets and Risks (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.