Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 62% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Domain 1: Governance(6 mappings)

CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy3 targets
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Domain 2: Identification(2 mappings)

CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment2 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Domain 3: Protection(4 mappings)

CRAF-3.1Access Control
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
CRAF-3.2Data Security
CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
CRAF-3.4Application Security
CSA-TVM-03Application Security (DevSecOps)
CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence

Domain 4: Detection(5 mappings)

CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
CRAF-4.3Security Testing3 targets
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
CSA-TVM-02Penetration Testing
CSA-TVM-03Application Security (DevSecOps)
CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection
CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging

Domain 5: Response and Recovery(3 mappings)

CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience
CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment, where 2 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 15 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

9 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.