HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation
See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 62% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Domain 1: Governance(16 mappings)
Domain 2: Identification(4 mappings)
+20 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment, where 2 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 15 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
9 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 7: Inherent Risk Assessment (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.