Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

HKMA C-RAF Domain 1-2: Governance + Identification (Cyber Strategy, Risk Mgmt, Asset Mgmt, Threat Assessment)(2 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment2 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-ML-2Evolving

HKMA C-RAF Domain 3-4: Protection + Detection (Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing)(10 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel10 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-D1-4Training and culture
CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing
CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
CAT-D3-2Detective controls
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
CAT-IRP-5External threats
CAT-ML-2Evolving

HKMA C-RAF Domain 5-6: Response & Recovery + Situational Awareness (IR, Recovery, Threat Intel, Info Sharing)(5 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain5-6-Response-Recovery-SitAwarenessHKMA C-RAF Domain 5 (Response and Recovery) + Domain 6 (Situational Awareness) - Incident Response, Recovery, Threat Landscape, Information Sharing5 targets
CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing
CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
CAT-IRP-5External threats

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 11 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline, where 4 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

Of 11 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 3 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

8 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.