Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
54%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 54% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 1: Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Domain 1: Governance(4 mappings)

CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance2 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-ML-2Evolving
CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy2 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-ML-2Evolving

Domain 3: Protection(6 mappings)

CRAF-3.1Access Control2 targets
CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
CRAF-3.5Security Awareness Training
CAT-D1-4Training and culture
CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management2 targets
CAT-D1-2Risk management
CAT-ML-2Evolving

Domain 4: Detection(5 mappings)

CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence3 targets
CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing
CAT-IRP-5External threats
CRAF-4.3Security Testing
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection
CAT-D3-2Detective controls

Domain 5: Response and Recovery(3 mappings)

CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing

Domain 6: Situational Awareness(2 mappings)

CRAF-6.1Cyber Threat Landscape Monitoring2 targets
CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 1: Governance, where 3 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 13 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 54% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

11 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 1: Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 1: Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.